Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Exact Holding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. postdlf (talk) 21:08, 24 October 2013 (UTC)

Exact Holding

Exact Holding (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability. Only references are either primary, press releases, directory entries or normal company announcements. Google searches not finding anything different. Disputed prod. noq (talk) 14:24, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

• Delete. Needs independent sources. - MrOllie (talk) 15:09, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

  Changing to Keep, now has sources. - MrOllie (talk) 15:21, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

• Keep Sources at https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exact_Holding. —Ruud 19:29, 17 October 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:52, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

• Provisional Keep assuming that the refs from the Dutch article meet RS, that they're significant coverage of the company, and that they're added to the article. Our job is not to look at the article to determine notability but rather to determine if the subject is notable and then make requests of editors to delete or improve the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:57, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
• Keep Needs heavy editing, but I assure you this is one of the largest software companies in the Netherlands. QVVERTYVS (hm?) 11:56, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Expanded with sources found at nlwiki that hopefully establish notability (mentions in a major newspaper and the high-profile business computing magazine/website Computable). QVVERTYVS (hm?) 12:45, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

• Strong Keep Very very old software, been around for half the time the software industry has been in existence. Clearly passes WP:GNG. scope_creep talk 19:53 24 October 2013 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.