Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ex parte Barton

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 05:47, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ex parte Barton

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Legal case fails WP:GNG. No secondary sources, other similar named cases actually seem more notable than this one. Mako001 (talk) 03:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (talk) 03:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of South Africa-related deletion discussions. Mako001 (talk) 03:36, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as written. I can see no case for this article. BD2412 T 05:23, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. This article is only two sentences long and the only source cited is the case itself. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 05:31, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.