Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ewan James Melville
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was speedy delete A7 (non-admin closure). ApprenticeFan talk contribs 00:06, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Ewan James Melville (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Does not sufficiently establish conformity to WP:N and WP:Notability (people) Intelligentsium (talk) 23:29, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy delete, has been repeatedly deleted for failing notability, the person who apparently has a conflict of interest on this subject repeatedly recreates it despite warnings, which he removes from his Talk page without discussion. This is turning into a disruption. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:44, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- An anonymous account is repeatedly removing the AfD tag from the article. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:47, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- There are zero Google news hits for "Ewan James Melville", "Ewan Melville" or "Ewan J. Melville". There are zero Google hits for "Ewan J. Melville" at all. All Google hits for "Ewan James Melville" are to myspace and youtube and such sites. There are 30 hits for "Ewan Melville", with several people of that name, none of them apparently referring to this person. The like to the New York Times goes to their main page, not to any news article about this person. Who then was a gentleman? (talk) 23:50, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Sheesh. I just read through his talk history. This is at least the fourth version of this article. Speedy delete and salt or it will just keep coming back. Hairhorn (talk) 23:53, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- Coming right up. User was reported to VIP anyway. PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:56, 29 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.