Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evrim Çalışkanları
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. The Bushranger One ping only 02:22, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Evrim Çalışkanları (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Tagged for notability for 5 years; couldn't confirm notability Boleyn (talk) 19:11, 15 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:58, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:GNG & WP:PROF.--RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 19:14, 16 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 01:43, 22 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Minor translation project, never received any coverage from any source that I could find, and no sources are provided in the article - which appears to be Original Research. --MelanieN (talk) 16:01, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.