Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolutionary philosophy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete all. --Mr. Lefty (talk) 23:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This page (and the others listed) is an essay/soapbox created by User:MikeBaharmast about a topic which has no google hits outside of http://www.mbscientific.com/. Evolutionary philosophy was a contested prod. Khatru2 03:26, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- I am also nominating these for the same reasons:
- Delete all as original research. NawlinWiki 03:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete all as original research and pseudoscientific gibberish. eaolson 03:39, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all as proposed. Gazpacho 03:44, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per above. OR, POV, soapbox. Fan-1967 04:20, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all. Clearly OR.--ragesoss 04:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all per above.
Evolutionary philosophy should perhaps be redirected to Social effect of evolutionary theory for the time being, although philosophy and evolution is a subject that may well be worth an article in its own right. - Smerdis of Tlön 14:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply] - Redirect the first one to philosophy of biology, delete the rest. ... discospinster talk 16:28, 16 October
2006 (UTC)
- I agree, that is a better redirect. - Smerdis of Tlön 21:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete OR. QuiteUnusual 18:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all --Peta 05:22, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Strong delete and Weak redirect. Specifically: Weak redirect Evolutionary philosophy -> philosophy of biology. Strong delete the other three: Morphological Flows, Material morphogenesis, and Social Morphogenesis. Reasoning is by nom and by eaolson for deletes. Resaonding for redirect is that it makes sense, but I'd be perfectly okay with a delete, too, on Evolutionary philosophy. AubreyEllenShomo 21:55, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete all decision to redirect can be made editorially after deletion has occured. Eluchil404 09:39, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.