Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolution of genders
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 20:41, 30 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Page is WP:OR, article's creator and sole editor has created this page to addres issues not covered in Evolution of sex page, the subject matter would properly belong in Evolution of sex if it were of encyclopedic quality. The editor admits (see article's talk page) to not being adequately informed on the topic and started writing the article in the hopes that answers would come for the questions he had. What is on the page is unencyclopedic original research, scientific sources on the topic were provided to the editor long ago, if well-founded material is produced it ought to go into Evolution of sex, there is nothing here worth merging. Pete.Hurd 15:53, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete and redirect to Evolution of sex. May well be a valid search term, but I don't see any justification for separate articles. Don't really see anything here worth keeping, but anything that someone feels is worthwhile can be added to the other article. Fan1967 16:30, 25 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Sex is a biological term (male/female), gender is a sociological term (man/woman). In other words, the evolution of the female form may not be the same as that of a woman.--Midnighttonight 07:41, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- True, but I have to point out that the article does not deal with this in any way, shape, or form, and the author admits to using the term "gender" to mean something entirely different from this widely accepted definition to which you allude. Pete.Hurd 11:21, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Should have been more clear. An article on this subject should exist, but not this one. We really need a simple statement for that (i.e. something on the same level as keep, delete, merge etc.). Take it as a delete --Midnighttonight 00:53, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete forthwith!. Utter nonesense, WP:OR, WP:NEO etc. Mikker ... 15:12, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as OR and apparent POV fork of Evolution of sex and/or Sexual reproduction. MCB 07:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.