Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evolok

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 02:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evolok[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No real indication of notability; the cites are not about the company, apart from one blog post about an award from one of its organisers (and of course "we award you this award" is no good for notability).

Additionally, "can't get there from here" - the article is a mass of obvious PR junk and if the company was notable this text would be of little use. (ETA: I was going to say, a pity this didn't go via AFC, but it did! It's a mystery to me how some of this stuff gets accepted.) Pinkbeast (talk) 07:58, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 09:49, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete PR, promotions, corporate spam !Light2021 (talk) 20:33, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete did Light2021 !vote twice on this? I can see why they might want to (the refs are not really about the company itself). Smallbones_(smalltalk) 19:59, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed it was my edit error. Light2021 (talk) 20:01, 29 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.