Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evil Spirits Intellectualism and Logic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. — Cirt (talk) 00:57, 10 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Evil Spirits Intellectualism and Logic[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No indication of notability for this book. Only one third-party source is cited, and it's a three-page piece written by the same person as the editor of this on-wiki article, in what seems to be more of a local newsletter than an academic journal. I looked around Google and Google Scholar and found no mentions off-wiki. rʨanaɢ (talk) 20:52, 1 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep (by the author). There has been shown a great deal of interest in tis book and accompanying article. Nearly 3,000 [2,873] have read it without a DYK to alert potential readers. The quotes explain positions better than paraphrasing.Billy Hathorn (talk) 21:15, 6 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 17:38, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete sources are almost entirely primary and I can confirm the nominator's lack of Googlable sources. Its Amazon page lists this book as out of print, so while I appreciate the amount of work that's gone into this, I don't see it as suitable for inclusion. Not opposed to Transwiki if there's an appropriate target. Jclemens (talk) 17:51, 2 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
redirect to L. L. Clover. The author seems notable, the book not so. JoshuaZ (talk) 17:28, 5 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:40, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete or Redirect No proof of notability outside notable author - and notability is NOTINHERITED. Yunshui (talk) 14:37, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Though this sounds like a highly amusing read, I'm not finding any significant coverage in reliable sources. - Smerdis of Tlön - killing the human spirit since 2003! 15:22, 8 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.