Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evidence of Inequity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Suggest the merge, if you are still interested, on the subject and targets talk. — _Maggot^Syn 05:22, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evidence of Inequity[edit]

Notability of this album is not presented or easily confirmed. Ecoleetage (talk) 03:09, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. Google comes up with a bunch of possible sources. The article needs a complete rewrite to make it adequate but the topic its on is ok. I suggest give the authour some time to work on it – and if its still in that condition in a week prod it. Fattyjwoods ^{Push my button} 04:46, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Merge into Beneath the Massacre per WP:MUSIC. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 04:48, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 23:25, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Why merge? It's a valid article, what would happen if we merge all albums into an artist's main article? Mess.--Kmaster (talk) 03:45, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mainly because of WP:MUSIC#Albums states "album articles with little more than a track listing may be more appropriately merged into the artist's main article". And actually you're right, all artists albums that are no more than a track listing should be merged according to wikipedia's guidelines. Esradekan Gibb ^"Talk" 03:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. But the idea of merging does not seem very bad, It might be a good alternative. Cannibaloki 02:36, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - I generally dislike deleting albums by notable artists, even if it's just a tracklisting. Don't get me wrong, I love deleting stuff, but albums stubs like this usually have enough assumed notability that, for me, deletion isn't a high priority. This one started out as a tracklisting, but I added a little bit, and the editor above me added a little bit more, and now it's improved. Not a featured article yet, but better. Who knows, someone else might come along and improve it even more, if we don't delete it first. --Bongwarrior (talk) 03:30, 27 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.