Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everstone Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:46, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Everstone Group[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a company therefore NCORP guidelines apply. None of the references meet NCORP's criteria for establishing notability, the vast majority are "Dependent Coverage" based substantially on PR and announcement. Others rely on interviews and have no "Independent Content". HighKing⁺⁺ 14:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Organizations and Companies. HighKing⁺⁺ 14:28, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Singapore-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:30, 25 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete for being a totally unremarkable private equity firm. Ari T. Benchaim (talk) 01:32, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Previously deleted at AFD, ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 14:41, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete = run of the mill private equity firm without significant coverage. This is bordering on spam. Bearian (talk) 15:11, 1 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.