Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Everstone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 12:07, 7 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Everstone[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Built by a sockpuppet, edited by sockpuppets WP:SOCK. Besides, fails WP:GNG, WP:NCORP, and lacks WP:SIGCOV. - Hatchens (talk) 03:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Asia-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 03:46, 22 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note to closer for soft deletion:? This nomination has had limited participation and falls within the standards set for lack of quorum. There are no previous AfD discussions, undeletions, or current redirects and no previous PRODs have been located. This nomination may be eligible for soft deletion at the end of its 7-day listing. --Cewbot (talk) 00:03, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Logs: 2018-02 ✗ G11

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stefka Bulgaria (talk) 10:12, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete There are some references that mention the company but none that meet our criteria for establishing notability. References which rely substantially on interviews fail WP:ORGIND. Likewise details which are copied from the company website or PR fails WP:ORGIND and/or WP:CORPDEPTH. Topic fails GNG/NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 11:08, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: The Mint article is quite substantial; while based upon an interview IMO is more of a feature article, and does start to build a case for notability. Business Line is a simple interview. I haven't been able to find any other coverage with any significance - lots of trivial mentions in PE announcements, corporate activity, etc. Overall, there isn't significant coverage to meet WP:NCORP. -M.Nelson (talk) 12:07, 3 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.