Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/EverGirl
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus with leave to speedy renominate. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:27, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
EverGirl[edit]
- EverGirl (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Historical line of non-notable products, possibly worth a mention at Nickelodeon (TV channel) if any relevant RS can be found. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 06:52, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- "if any relevant RS can be found"? don't you look? I see many RS available.--Milowent • hasspoken 15:15, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry, that was unclear. I meant if RS can be found that imply relevance to the Nickelodeon article. While there are certainly mentions on numerous websites, any notability seems to be inherited from Nickelodeon itself. This is the sort of thing I was referring to, discussing the project in a broader sense of Nickelodeon's non-television strategy. ▫ JohnnyMrNinja 02:35, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 14:36, 9 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 15:49, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Alpha_Quadrant (talk) 21:50, 15 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.