Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evelyne Jobe Villines

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Sandstein 20:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Evelyne Jobe Villines[edit]

Evelyne Jobe Villines (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:BIO or WP:GNG Boleyn (talk) 13:05, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iowa-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 14:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete individual with only local coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:13, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep I was curious why there was a complete mismatch between the article and the descriptions of it above. Then I saw that Megalibrarygirl has been at work. Plenty of references, not exclusively local (and it wouldn't matter even if they were). Hey ho, we'll have to look for something else to delete. Thincat (talk) 12:07, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: Now well referenced.--Ipigott (talk) 15:10, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep She passes GNG. It was likely she would be notable since she was an inductee into the Iowa Women's Hall of Fame. Pinging John Pack Lambert to take another look now that there are plenty of references from reliable sources. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:20, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Reping Johnpacklambert since I messed it up above. Megalibrarygirl (talk) 19:22, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.