Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve van Grafhorst

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Nomination withdrawn LibStar (talk) 23:59, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Eve van Grafhorst

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

as per WP:ONEVENT, as tragic as her life was, the coverage centres around her HIV infection. [1]. LibStar (talk) 11:21, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The context is broader and the role of media in this case was really significant, see [2]. I don't think WP:ONEVENT applies here. This article should be kept, as it shows the social reception of a disease of which little was known back in 1980s. --Vejvančický (talk | contribs) 12:07, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As per Vejvančický. Bondegezou (talk) 12:19, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, WP:ONEVENT doesn't apply - "if the event is highly significant, and the individual's role within it is a large one, a separate article is generally appropriate". XLerate (talk) 13:11, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per XLerate. A very big story at the time, and plenty of room for expansion if 1980s news/comment was easier to access. Adpete (talk) 23:25, 25 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.