Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eve Teschmacher

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Core desat 07:46, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Eve Teschmacher[edit]

Delete - prod removed by SPA. Character does not warrant separate article to describe her role in the plot of the two films per WP:WAF and WP:PLOT. No prejudice to recreation should she actually appear in the comics and with verifiable information beyond simple plot descriptions but as it stands the article should be deleted. Otto4711 19:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Non-notable fictional character. -- Mikeblas 19:14, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional characters-related deletions. —Quasirandom 19:38, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No secondary sources to establish notability or provide real world context. Jay32183 21:48, 13 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but merge relevant info into one of the Superman film articles. Gene Hackman enjoyed yelling "miss teschMACHer!!" and like Ned Beatty's "Otis", Valerie Perrine provided some comic relief. Like Beatty, her role was created strictly for the 1978 film by someone, and maybe there's some interesting story there. Not enough for her own article, however. Mandsford 01:48, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: Notable; Wikipedia is not supposed to be a bureaucracy; Wikipedia is not paper; and people not wanting to read this article are usually not forced to read it, the article is found by being linked to in one way or another or by being typed in a URL or search engine. It's not like this article is being being inconvenient or anything. Is it adding extra poundage to a book or something?--Neverpitch 01:56, 14 November 2007 (UTC) — Neverpitch (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]
"Comment' One could make that argument about any article... nobody's forced to read it, it's not inconvenient, etc. The articles for deletion section is where the amateur editors become amateur publishers, debating on whether a particular article stays in Wikipedia. Nobody would say that Eve Teschmacher doesn't deserve any writeup at all; perhaps she would be in a paragraph in another article (about the Alexander Salkin film, or about Valerie Perrine). Just not her own page. Mandsford 03:08, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.