Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Evan Batten

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. SarahStierch (talk) 04:45, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Evan Batten

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Clearly a vanity article written by either the subject or one of his friends. Fails WP:GNG. Jrcla2 (talk) 19:00, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Jinkinson talk to me 19:04, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I agree with the nominator. I don't see any evidence of notability, and there's nothing on Google News. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 20:10, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. The "websites" listed aren't references but simply three local articles the subject has written. --— Rhododendrites ^talk | 20:13, 2 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete no specific claims of notability, pretty promotional; also these are no sources, so fails WP:Verifiability I couldn't find anything that includes Evan Batten as a main topic of a publication, that makes the article fail GNG too. Alex^{discussion ★} 00:02, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 03:28, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Colorado-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Basketball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.