Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Vortex
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. John254 03:06, 28 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Eva Vortex[edit]
- Eva Vortex (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
I have nominated this article based on my reasoning at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kimberly Devine. Not a notable enough person for a Wikipedia article, and at worst, self-promotional. MartinShadow (talk) 04:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 04:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and actresses-related deletion discussions. -- StarM 04:20, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Tabercil (talk) 04:23, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- keep, won Porn Artist of the Year 2007 at the UK Erotic Awards, and it's referenced. Meets WP:PORNBIO. Esradekan Gibb "Talk" 04:54, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:PORNBIO. The nom's rationale is partly WP:OTHERSTUFF. This article has nothing comparable to the issues with Kimberly Devine. • Gene93k (talk) 05:07, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per Esradekan's reasoning. - Mgm|(talk) 09:17, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep the referenced awards are suitable enough I guess. JBsupreme (talk) 18:09, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- strong delete regardless of what porn followers recruited might turn up and say. No coverage in real WP:RS outside this subculture.[1][2] We are not an AVN/porn encyclopedia. Sticky Parkin 18:49, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Weak keep if the referenced award is notable--the site is independent, so its a 3rd party source. Whether the award is in fact notable is outside my ability to judge. DGG (talk) 20:12, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep award means subject passes WP:pornbio. Horrorshowj (talk) 09:45, 25 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.