Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Robin's

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Consensus is that Eva meets WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG. (non-admin closure) Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:58, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eva Robin's[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Subject doesn't meet WP:N; the referenced coverage of her consists solely of trivial or passing mentions, and some not meeting WP:RELY. NoCOBOL (talk) 13:19, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:21, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:22, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:23, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 18:24, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

comment A cursory Google News search turns up 3,800 results (two from Vogue in the first page). They are all in Italian; I don't speak Italian, nor am I familiar with the authority of various publications. 1. The sheer volume of these results implies she meets WP:GNG. 2. I do not think anyone should vote to delete unless someone with Italian language fluency + publishing knowledge can assess the 3,800 sources. --Theredproject (talk) 18:35, 12 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- I can't find the relevant policy at this time, but a simple count of google search results is supposed to have no bearing on a move to delete. NoCOBOL (talk) 05:11, 14 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, she was lead actress in several movies (eg. Belle al Bar), presenter of several tv programs on Italian televison (eg. Primadonna on Italia 1 [1]), is still active as lead actress on stage ([2], [3]), and received plenty of coverage in newspapers, magazines and books, eg. [4] or [5], several books describe Robins as the "most famous transgender in Italy" ([6], or [7]). The article is shitty (it says nothing about the career), but BTW almost all the current coverage is NOT trivial/passing mentions, the listed articles are all about the subject, she even appears in the title! Source 5 is from the major Italian newspaper, Corriere della Sera. --151.74.244.146 (talk) 00:58, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as subject meets WP:GNG. -- Willthacheerleader18 (talk) 03:57, 16 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as a clear pass of WP:GNG and WP:NACTOR#1, though either one would be enough on its own under WP:N. Plenty of coverage easily located, so article can be improved (it needs it). Note that non-English-language sources are explicitly allowed under Wikipedia policy. Bakazaka (talk) 05:13, 18 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.