Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eva Asderaki
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to List of tennis umpires. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:25, 27 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Eva Asderaki (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
One of the very few tennis umpire articles. See Category:Tennis umpires. Article is mainly about a single controversy. I cannot find in depth reliable sources to make this into a more balanced article. MakeSense64 (talk) 11:04, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:02, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete per nom. Lajbi Holla @ me • CP 19:33, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Smerge and redirect to 2011_US_Open_(tennis)#Day 14 (11 September) per WP:BLP1E. The tennis umpire is only notable for one controversy, which should be mentioned in the 2011 US Open (tennis) article. Armbrust, B.Ed. Let's talkabout my edits? 12:02, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:07, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 23:47, 19 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment In cooperation with other editors from project tennis we have created List of tennis umpires, because we think they deserve some coverage on WP, but we have not enough sources to create standalone articles for (most of) them. In a way it would be rather unfair if the umpires that got into controversy get an article, while the others do not. So an alternative would be to have this page redirect to List of tennis umpires MakeSense64 (talk) 08:37, 20 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - Thumbs up for the redirect to the umpire list option. Fyunck(click) (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.