Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eusabio schmendrick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. WP:SNOW MBisanz talk 16:01, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Eusabio schmendrick (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Most likely a hoax. The Bantu Wind was the ship in Indiana Jones. No g-hits on Eusabio schmendrick. Also, Schmendricks Law (snicker) seems to be not notable. No sources. OliverTwisted (Talk) (Stuff) 06:43, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - looks like a hoax to me. Óðinn (talk) 06:48, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Complete bollocks and a poorly constructed hoax. No Ghits for alleged person or the "did you mean?" google throws up. Doc StrangeMailboxLogbook 07:08, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete As has been said, it would appear to be a hoax, and a poorly done one at thatPstanton 07:26, 28 December 2008 (UTC)
- Delete IPNI has no record of a botanist by this name. What's more, the article mentions he's a botanist and then goes on to discuss his contributions to faunal observations. Don't think the "red mangrove" exists, either. Hoax. Rkitko (talk) 01:06, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —David Eppstein (talk) 07:36, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Schmendrick means fool or jerk in yiddish, (probably from the 1877 Shmendrik). Extremely rare as a name during this supposed person's life. Obvious hoax.John Z (talk) 08:02, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, hoax. Nsk92 (talk) 08:22, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.