Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Training network Of PhD researchers on Innovative EMI analysis and power Applications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Maybe these researchers should research proper capitalization first. Sandstein 20:08, 10 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

European Training network Of PhD researchers on Innovative EMI analysis and power Applications

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability not established and article mostly written by COI editors.

Only one of the sources is independent, and this is an interview on a local television station. The remaining sources are all affiliated with the project. (If additional sources do establish notability, the Wiki procedure for articles by Paid Editors is to go through AfC)

The major contributors are Paid Editors. Also, the first three sections on the Talk page show a misunderstanding of Wikipedia's purpose, since they intend for ETOPIA employees to use the article to publish news from the program, instead of unbiased editors seeking to create encyclopaedic content. 1292simon (talk) 08:28, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. There is no evidence of independent coverage in reliable sources to satisfy WP:ORGDEPTH. It would seem that the page's editors have fundamentally misunderstood the purpose of Wikipedia, and would benefit from acquainting themselves with WP:NOTPROMO. ~dom Kaos~ (talk) 08:50, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - per nom. Pamzeis (talk) 09:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Lightburst (talk) 14:04, 2 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.