Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/European Association of Political Consultants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 13:01, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

European Association of Political Consultants[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG/WP:NCORP. Apart from a few passing mentions, I found no coverage of this organization. Kleuske (talk) 12:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 16:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Europe-related deletion discussions. Sam Sailor 16:54, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep What kind of coverage are you looking for? The EAPC is an Association in which all Political Consultants from Europe are professionally organized within. It's mother organization is called International Association of Political Consultants who was founded by Joe Napolitan, who is one of the first and most famous Spin Doctors of the last century. The article should not be deleted and is of relevance. Cultureprof (talk) 12:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC) — Cultureprof (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

Keep The EAPC is a collection of many of the most important political consultants in modern history and today. Most spin doctors actively discourage self-coverage because this is the nature of their work. Similarly, the work of a spin doctor is borne out in the policies, strategies and campaigns of politicians, and not through personal recognition. One cannot judge the importance of an organisation or its members by the press coverage they receive. 100percentrecord (talk) 15:09, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting since there clearly disagreement. However editors need to provide specific justifications, with sources if appropriate, currently the !votes are more like WP:ITSNOTABLE. Additionally, notability is not a judgement of importance
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Nosebagbear (talk) 10:31, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:50, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - no notable Ghits besides sites related to the organization, fails WP:GNG. Kirbanzo (talk) 01:52, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.