Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Euphemisms for vagina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete (copyvio). Anas ^talk? 11:07, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Euphemisms for vagina

Delete, do not transwiki. Wikipedia not a dictionary of slang. No transwiki, because original unverified collection. `'Miikka 02:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - even if this were notable, the best thing to do would be to use redirects and I don't think that's needed. -WarthogDemon 02:03, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Delete Not a dictionary Corpx
Delete just slang. JJL 02:52, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Absolutely delete Simply does not belong here. Bec-Thorn-Berry 04:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone else. Anyone else notice that many of the euphemisms are really for the vulva? Guess some guys don't know the difference? --Charlene 04:17, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it for every possible reason. --Haemo 04:18, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom -MrFizyx 04:22, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Page exists already at this page Kwsn^(Ni!) 04:38, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This is a violation of our policy WP:NOT. Wikipedia is not a dictionary it is a encyclopedia.--†Sir James Paul† 06:01, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Comment It bears something of a resemblance to this page as well [1] Nick mallory 06:27, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy Delete as per above and copyvio point by Nick. I have tagged the article as a copyvio and reported it. -- Reaper X 07:29, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Language-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:12, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as copyvio from the 'Muffy's World of Vagina Euphemisms' website above, clearly marked with a (c) symbol. Kim Dent-Brown ^{(Talk to me)} 09:54, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged for speedy delete as a blatant copyright violation. WODUP 10:16, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.