Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eumenides in the Fourth Floor Lavatory

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Unaccompanied Sonata and Other Stories. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 19:49, 20 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Eumenides in the Fourth Floor Lavatory[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Although the author is notable for other works, the article gives no reason to think that this particular short story is particularly notable, and the article consists only of a plot summary. I put a notability tag on it in March of last year, and in the intervening nine months nobody has put forth any arguments saying that the story is notable (for that matter, nobody made any changes to the article at all). So I propose that the article should be deleted as not notable; if an editor wanted to add content about the story, it could easily be added to the article on the short story collection of which it is a part. Guy who reads a lot (talk) 14:19, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:04, 5 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 00:29, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. No significant coverage whatsoever, no sources, no awards for this story specifically, nothing. dkonstantinos (talk) 05:32, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No evidence of notability. Cusop Dingle (talk) 17:57, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to the the collection whete it was published first. Muslim lo Juheu (talk) 00:52, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.