Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eudes de Montreuil

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:50, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eudes de Montreuil[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article does not have context and i am sure it does not meet notability criteria. Trains2050 (talk) 11:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Trains2050 (talk) 11:21, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In addition to the sources already in the article, here are three others 1, 2, 3. Mccapra (talk) 12:32, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Many, many French-language sources. Books and articles in GScholar. Oaktree b (talk) 16:39, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:05, 3 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: not only is he discussed in the relevant literature, there are plenty of books discussing his work in several languages. Another example of tech-centric sourcing discrimination. PK650 (talk) 05:26, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.