Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethiopia Habtemariam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 01:07, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ethiopia Habtemariam

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable biography. Turtlewong (talk) 03:02, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ethiopia-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Women-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 06:01, 5 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 17:14, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:41, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've poked around a bit and I've found some significant coverage in reliable newspapers. Examples: [1] [2] [3] [4] and [5]. This probably means it scrapes through the general notability guideline. The current sourcing in the article is quite poor, but deletion isn't cleanup, so I'm going to go with a weak keep.--SkyGazer 512 ^{Oh no, what did I do this time?} 14:19, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The nominator appears not to have perform basic searches as required per WP:BEFORE, given that there are sources available on her in major publications (as given by SkyGazer 512). Should qualify under WP:GNG. Hzh (talk) 01:00, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 15:10, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.