Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethelbert the Tiger

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Lankiveil (speak to me) 13:05, 14 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Ethelbert the Tiger[edit]

Ethelbert the Tiger (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not appear to meet WP:GNG. Launchballer 20:49, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Comics and animation-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:48, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:49, 29 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, –Davey2010(talk) 03:44, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment -- This was tagged 7 years ago. It may have been planned at that point. Surely it has been aired by now, if it ever is going to be. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:32, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I know for a fact it was released on DVD, because my sister put me through it the night I tagged this article (this AfD was a sort of revenge). She had seen it on TV before, so it's whether or not it was BBC or CBBC, where most of its kind are aired. If this gets kept, there is a blurb on the back which I will add to the article.--Launchballer 17:47, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, MrScorch6200 (talk | ctrb) 02:13, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - No references, no evidence of notability.--Rpclod (talk) 02:31, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was on the BBC for two seasons. [4] I don't see any reviews or ratings information though. Dream Focus 04:46, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete based on lack of adequate sourcing it appears non-notable. --Bejnar (talk) 16:41, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.