Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ethan James (clothing)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. RL0919 (talk) 16:24, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ethan James (clothing)[edit]

Ethan James (clothing) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

i think this may be a hoax in terms of notability and even existence - I can't find anything in terms of sourcing to support it's inclusion much less existence, even their own website doesn't verify the content. I've searched google books, google news and newspapers for both Ethan Farrell (as it pertains to clothing/business as opposed to the young actor) and Ethan James and I can't find anything. A google search of "Embrace by Ethan James" for the perfume also brings back all Wikipedia mirrors. Their archived website doesn't even exist save for a placeholder and there really just isn't anything I can find to support a single statement here. PRAXIDICAE💕 16:15, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.