Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eternal Weint Sein Gold & Jewelry

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:44, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Eternal Weint Sein Gold & Jewelry

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Zero notability— the only reference provided is a link to the company Facebook page. A search for possible sources turned up nil except for their advertisements, which we cannot use. Helen(💬📖) 23:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies and Myanmar. Helen(💬📖) 23:25, 2 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support as the only CCS the article makes ("invented very first Golden Handbag and Golden Scarf for Lady") is obviously a hoax. This is probably the only thing preventing speedy deletion. Aaron Liu (talk) 06:37, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 08:38, 4 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: An article previously rejected at AfC, after which only the formatting was improved and the article was moved into mainspace by the WP:COI article creator. Searches find routine listings ([1]) but not the evidence of notability required here. AllyD (talk) 11:15, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - even if it's not a hoax, it's surely spam and a run of the mill jewelry store, one of tens of thousands. Bearian (talk) 16:59, 6 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - total garbage, promo, possible hoax. Jacona (talk) 00:44, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete possible COI, I admit that the Weint Sein is the country's one of the largest gold market and company. However unfortunately I found nothing coverage about the gold company. Taung Tan (talk) 10:35, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Lacks independent sources establishing that WP:NCORP is met. MrsSnoozyTurtle 22:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.