Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estonia–Pakistan relations

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 01:19, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Estonia–Pakistan relations

another laughable random combination from the obsessive creator. non resident ambassadors. the Estonian govt notes: "In 2007, Pakistan was Estonia’s 72nd largest export partner, while imports from Pakistan to Estonia ranked it as Estonia’s 44th largest import partner." "Estonia has made no investments in Pakistan." http://www.vm.ee/eng/kat_176/5431.html LibStar (talk) 01:23, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Libstar, you can't have it both ways, you can't ignore the embassy in one AFD, then cite no embassies as a reason for deleting in another AfD. Ikip (talk) 02:19, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A Google news search doesn't turn up much [1] and [2]. Mandsford (talk) 01:37, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete for the usual reasons: non-notable intersection of countries. JJL (talk) 01:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no embassies, no strategic ties, no sources. Even the Estonians admit: "No agreements have been signed between Estonia and Pakistan... Economic relations between the two countries have remained modest". - Biruitorul ^Talk 03:19, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails notability and not a directory or random collection of information. Better to have 200 sections or articles on "Foreign relations of ..." for each sovereign nation than about 20,000 random pairings which merely regurgitate information from the websites of the foreign ministries, and which will quickly become stale and outdated.Edison (talk) 15:40, 29 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included on the and Wikipedia:WikiProject International relations/Bilateral relations task force/Deletion page(s), which are related to this deletion discussion. User:Ikip
weak delete unless sources are provided, nominator makes a good argument. Ikip (talk) 02:21, 5 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.