Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Estee Applauder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 01:14, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Estee Applauder[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete: insufficient notability. Fails WP:GNG as Google search turned up nothing but mirror sites with exact same info. Quis separabit? 02:09, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 04:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sexuality and gender-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 04:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletion discussions. sst ✈ 04:12, 12 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete fails WP:GNG. gnews only refers to one source. LibStar (talk) 01:33, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:27, 19 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Questionable for WP:CREATIVE. SwisterTwister talk 23:36, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.