Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Essential R&B the Very Best of R&B: Spring 2005 (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 23:32, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Essential R&B the Very Best of R&B: Spring 2005[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Let's try this one again, as it received no interest when nominated two years ago. A non-notable album from a non-notable series. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 01:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - this is not notable and fits in with the similar albums in this series that do not have pages. USM the Weather Whiz (Shoot me a line) 05:05, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:26, 22 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, czar · · 05:58, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. The Legend of Zorro 12:25, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - Non notable music album collection. Fails WP:MUSIC Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 14:34, 29 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.