Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esmirelda
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 03:08, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Esmirelda[edit]
The article has claims to notability, but 100% of ghits return promotion, directory and self-published material. No media coverage. Not signed with a label, and their sole CD is self-published. Vanispamcruftizement. Coren 02:52, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- disclaimer Either I'm blind or I'm going senile, but I've just noticed the claim to having won local music prizes. I still think this article is on the wrong side of WP:BAND, but this may influence others. Coren 02:57, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete Looks like spam/self promotion to me Corpx 03:27, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete, fails WP:MUSIC. --Dhartung | Talk 04:13, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. She'll still have MySpace. Capmango 05:02, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete--ZayZayEM 05:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Washington-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 12:26, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete it is self promotion: the creator has the same name as the page. Also, I should add the subject isn't notable anyway. Acalamari 20:11, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.