Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eslam Magdy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ansh 666 07:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Eslam Magdy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing the steps on an incomplete nomination. The original nominator indicated that the article was self-promotional. To that I would add concerns about the sourcing, and about notability. There are sources, but they appear to be references to the subject's work - videos of times when they were interviewed, for example, or websites where their work is published. Good as far as it goes, perhaps, but what we need to show that the subject is notable are references that discuss the subject themselves. An article about this person would work, an article by them would not. Admittedly, I'm a native English speaker, so my searches in Arabic may not be comprehensive - but I am as yet unable to come up with adequate sources. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 17:38, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Egypt-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 17:48, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete no where near passing the notability guidelines for journalists.John Pack Lambert (talk) 05:11, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:26, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 19:56, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete A few quotes and mentions, not enough for the GNG. L3X1 (distænt write) 02:57, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.