Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Esa Piironen

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. WP:NPASR due to low participation. (non-admin closure) f e minist 14:21, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Esa Piironen

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A very nice resume, but doesn't seem to be a notable architect. Many of his awards are second or third-place finishes in what appears to be unremarkable, local competitions. There are even a few honorable mentions. Esprit15d • talk • contribs 12:13, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 02:31, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tentative keep -- appears to have been involved in a number of notable projects in public spaces: subways stations, etc; sample & another. More sources probably exist in Finnish. K.e.coffman (talk) 01:34, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 11:43, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Article needs work and toning down. A google book search - [1] convinced me to vote keep. e.g. - [2][3][4][5][6][7][8].Icewhiz (talk) 08:22, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.