Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erin Rosenthal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JForget 00:31, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Erin Rosenthal[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Speedy contested. Elevating for discussion. Looks to fail WP:BIO. delete UtherSRG (talk) 12:12, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - as nominator. A lot of fringe mentions in Google searches but I'm not seeing anything that meets the needs of WP:RS. Jusdafax 15:09, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of New Mexico-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 12:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- UtherSRG (talk) 12:13, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - Covered in New York TImes , Boston Globe, multiple articles in the Providence Journal, and many others. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Endlessmug (talk • contribs) 17:58, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Weak Delete, the sources pointed out so far are one sentence or less, so they fall under "passing mentions". WP:GNG requires significant coverage, which I do not see for this article. --Joshua Scott (LiberalFascist) 06:43, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. —Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:04, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The two sources given above are reviews of the same group exhibition. Passing mentions, not significant coverage.--Ethicoaestheticist (talk) 23:15, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Does not meet WP:N requirements on the evidence to date with passing mentions. Ty 23:54, 3 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.