Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Mariñelarena

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. Mindmatrix 17:11, 22 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Mariñelarena[edit]

Non-notable, just an independent filmmaker, same for his three short films De entre los zapatos, Historia de una madre, and Fe (Short film). Vizcarra 01:12, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all, fails Google test. Unnoticed by media. Non-notable. --Vizcarra 01:17, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Wikipedia doesn't have or need notability requirements. —Simetrical (talk) 04:12, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Your link goes to a talk page, not a policy. This page, which says that unremarkable people can be speedy deleted, is official policy. Delete, fails to establish notability. User:Zoe|^(talk) 04:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- You are correct to note that my stated reasoning is invalid in this instance. I was not aware of the policy at the time I originally commented. My vote is now reluctantly delete unless evidence can be provided that one or more of the individual's films was widely screened. However, since the CFD vote for some bizarre reason only applied to people (see Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion/Proposal#P1 .28Expeditious deletion for articles not asserting notability.29), it seems that my voting to keep the movie pages (provided their existence is backed up by sources) is not contrary to policy. —Simetrical (talk) 08:08, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Clarification: keep the movie articles if they can be verified. —Simetrical (talk) 05:41, 19 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as non-noteworthy and possible vanity. Ifnord 20:35, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per above. Tom Harrison ^(talk) 21:50, 16 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as minor, and as probable vanity. And Simetrical should stop confusing his personal beliefs with policy. --Calton | Talk 00:17, 17 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]
delete as per nomination. Gaius Cornelius 17:31, 20 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.