Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erik Drost

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect: whereas everybody agrees that notability has been not demonstrated at the moment, there is an obvious target for a redirect, which is always preferable to deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 07:28, 28 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Erik Drost

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG. Searches come up with no evidence of notability. ThePlatypusofDoom (talk) 23:20, 13 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The best I could find was this, which is not enough for notability. I only have a limited ability to search Dutch sources, so I am willing to be persuaded if somebody else finds something. Also, there is no corresponding Dutch page, which is not evidence, but suggestive. Vanamonde93 (talk) 05:46, 20 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete non-notable musician.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:19, 23 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.