Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Netsch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 03:29, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Netsch

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Obvious promotional intent. Basically nothing for sources out there other than social media an run-of-the mill index pages. GMG ^talk 14:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Vanity bio. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 14:35, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All entries are facts backed by articles. Not intended for promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickybetsch (talk • contribs)

If there are further edits that need to be made please suggest them. I will make them so it does not appear as promotional content. It is my first contribution though I referenced other Wiki pages for how to write it.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickybetsch (talk • contribs)

Delete per nom SeraphWiki (talk) 14:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I've dug around and I've not found anything to support having an article here. Sure, he exists, and he's on various social media outlets, and he's trying to promote his startups, etc. But, so far, he's not drawn the attention of any secondary sources. All but two of the citations do not even mention Eric Netsch. Of the two that do, one is self generated and the other just mentions him in passing. There's nothing here to support passage of WP:GNG. --Hammersoft (talk) 14:52, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 16:19, 24 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete its not notable and refs are not solidKamran Ali El-Batli (talk) 18:37, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Stuartyeates (talk) 20:37, 28 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete promotional, no claim of meeting any SNG, and the references are as bad as Hammersoft says. The obvious redirect target, Tapcart, is a redlink. power~enwiki (π, ν) 18:14, 29 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.