Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Kessler

Eric Kessler

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Of the five sources cited, only one is actually about Kessler, and it's an interview. A Google News search yielded some obituaries about other people with the same name, and this article, but that's all. This could be merged into Arabella Advisors but there's really nothing of value to merge. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:22, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Per shit sources and the WP:TEA request. Babysharkboss2!! ^{(No Life 'Til Leather)} 19:32, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Babysharkboss2: What criterion for speedy deletion do you think this meets? jlwoodwa (talk) 19:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Like nom, I come by way of the request at the Teahouse from someone claiming to be Kessler (I know this doesn't affect the discussion; just saying for transparency). And like nom, I have done my own search and failed to find WP:SIGCOV in RS. Because I can't decide which would be the better redirect target—Arabella Advisors or the Hopewell Fund that it manages—I am !voting for straightforward deletion. Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 19:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Businesspeople, Politics, and Washington, D.C.. Skynxnex (talk) 20:38, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak delete there's almost enough sourcing for article. Probably not right now and I weigh good faith requests for deletion in cases like this fairly highly. I would oppose a redirect since there are other Eric Kesslers mentioned in various articles as they're all dab mentions, a dab page would be questionable as well, for now. Skynxnex (talk) 20:43, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]