Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Evans (actor)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:50, 17 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Evans (actor)[edit]

Eric Evans (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails PORNBIO and the GNG. No qualifying awards. No nontrivial reliable sourcing. Negligible biographical content. Abusively deprodded without explanation or article improvement by the usual suspect. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (aka Hullaballoo) (talk) 21:35, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:45, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:46, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom - Fails PORNBIO & GNG. –Davey2010Talk 14:17, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete Awards won aren't notable ones and doesn't pass the GNG with the one book piece on award wins (in which many of the awards mentioned to have been won by the subjects don't even seem to notable ones) isn't enough to pass GNG. Wikiuser20102011 (talk) 19:51, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.