Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eric Arnoux

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was WP:SNOW delete. BD2412 T 00:04, 24 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eric Arnoux[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I think this fails WP:BLPCRIME. It reads as a coatrack or attack page, and I do not think we need it. Guy (help!) 22:41, 18 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete ... I would be willing to consider this. If it can be proven that any of the sources are reliable and show adequate representation of the subject in reliable sources, I would be happy to reconsider. MPS1992 (talk) 00:50, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Crime-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 13:23, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete .. The journalistic sources seem reliable enough, but without the criminal allegations there would be nothing notable. Since it's still in court, then per WP:BLPCRIME it should be deleted. FrankP (talk) 09:36, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete being investigated for fraud is not a sign of notability.John Pack Lambert (talk) 16:46, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:BLPCRIME Apart from basic biographical details, most of the article concerns allegations which are as yet unproven. Neiltonks (talk) 19:57, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - could be added again if new info arrives.BabbaQ (talk) 14:22, 21 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per BLPCRIME and NOTNEWSPAPER Chetsford (talk) 02:22, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete .. The journalistic sources seem reliable enough, but without the criminal allegations there would be nothing notable. WP:BLPCRIME it should be deleted. JeanDeLaRomandi (talk) 23:22, 23 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.