Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ergonom Microscope

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedily deleted per WP:CSD#G11 by RyanGerbil10 Arkyan  ^(talk) 21:10, 11 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ergonom Microscope

Nominated for speedy as an "A7, press release", but I'm not sure what that means. Is this a hoax, a product too new to include in WP, or something worth covering somewhere? Weak delete, pending AfD investigation. Xoloz 21:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds spammy in tone. Delete accordingly. --Dennisthe2 21:23, 8 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete as speedy nominator. Unsourced product plug, A7, yada. Article should have been rejected at WP:AFC. I only noticed it because i submit stuff there myself. 64.160.39.153 00:42, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as fringe science vanispamcruftisement. Anville 13:49, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's interesting, but an article has to wait until evaluation by third parties are coming and can be used as reliable sources. --Pjacobi 15:37, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete per 64.160.39.153. See the edit history. This was created by Kaori for an anon. The link in the article does not back up the text, so I am concluding that this is something of a hoax. --EMS | Talk 19:06, 9 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete definitely spammy in tone. "It will require a rethink of optical physics theories"? —Resurgent insurgent 2007-04-10 02:47Z

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.