Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epsilon Team (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎. ✗plicit 01:43, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Epsilon Team

AfDs for this article:

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not notable. Single source and no more to be found Very Average Editor (talk) 06:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Paranormal-related deletion discussions. Very Average Editor (talk) 06:23, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Conspiracy theories, Organizations, and Greece. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 08:31, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. There were already multiple sources and I have added another one. Ffranc (talk) 08:41, 5 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 07:11, 12 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as the article seems good, at least now. Btw, it is a good use of Wikipedia, to provide coverage of conspiracy theories, IMHO. --Doncram (talk,contribs) 18:31, 15 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Keep a lot of reliable greek sourscew about the subject, websites and books. ΔώραΣτρουμπούκη (talk) 00:10, 18 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.