Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epromos.com

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 02:58, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Epromos.com

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article was created as a promo / advertorial by an SPA. It also seems native advertising in violation of the wikipedia's paid editing terms of service. So it should be deleted for that violation.

Looking content and references wise, the article still fails WP:GNG and lacks indepth third party references. Whatever that exists out there is either PR, paid news bare mentions or partner profiles. Not notable at all and wikipedia is not a corporate directory. So please delete. Jesve Psernel (talk) 05:42, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 10:06, 18 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sam Sailor 09:34, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Originally a WP:SPA article, with a WP:PROD subsequently removed by the article creator. The references then added and now available are routine run-of-the-mill coverage, as are the best-places-to-work and industry awards. There is also a brief quotation from the company founder in association with a media item about promotional scooters 18 years ago, but I see no WP:RS coverage sufficient for the WP:NCORP criteria. AllyD (talk) 10:55, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.