Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Epic level
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sandstein 19:26, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Epic level (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Minor aspect of Dungeons and Dragons gameplay that fails WP:GNG and WP:GAMEGUIDE. Lacks significant mentions in reliable sources. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. ZXCVBNM (TALK) 19:08, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. There really are not any sources discussing the term outside of the actual game books. It certainly is a part of the game, but there is not enough to justify this being a separate article. I would probably also be fine if there were to be a light Merge to Dungeons & Dragons gameplay. Rorshacma (talk) 23:32, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
- Delete. There is no section about experience and leveling in Dungeons & Dragons gameplay, and this concept would warrant a small mention in such a section if it existed, but I'm not sure if there's merit to including any information about levels there. —烏Γ (kaw) │ 05:26, 05 May 2020 (UTC)
- User:KarasuGamma, I added a little information for Dungeons & Dragons gameplay#Character class as this was inexplicably missing, and badly needed. 2601:249:8B80:4050:F016:9D0D:605:521B (talk) 12:39, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- Or, should I say, I added one but it was reverted out. 2601:249:8B80:4050:F016:9D0D:605:521B (talk) 21:16, 5 May 2020 (UTC)
- I agree with that revert, unfortunately. Expanding the scope of the gameplay article too far would turn it into a fork of the PHB. —烏Γ (kaw) │ 00:58, 06 May 2020 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.