Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enzo Riccardo Campagnolo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems like there is no evidence either WP:PROF or WP:GNG are met. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 05:58, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Enzo Riccardo Campagnolo[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has been without sources since it was created in 2005. Even if sourced, I can't see anything here that meets the notability criteria at WP:NACADEMIC. John of Reading (talk) 09:18, 6 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete non-notable academic.John Pack Lambert (talk) 01:38, 7 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:41, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep. Although citations (under E R Campagnolo) not quite as high as desired, but WP:GNG may be attained. Xxanthippe (talk) 01:44, 9 October 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Delete instead as none of this amounts to a convincing article with applicable notability, WP:GNG is not heavily taken with this specific subject as it's not the important applicable notability, he's not notable as an author either, so there's simply nothing else actually convincing. SwisterTwister talk 22:50, 9 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. He has one well-cited publication in Google scholar ("Antimicrobial residues in animal waste and water resources proximal to large-scale swine and poultry feeding operations") but it's not enough for WP:PROF#C1 and no other notability is evident in this unsourced BLP. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:18, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]
deletefails GNG. thanks for picking this up. so much to clean up... Jytdog (talk) 01:48, 12 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.