Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enytially

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Closing early based on early consensus. Missvain (talk) 22:36, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Enytially[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fail of WP:GNG. As per WP:LISTED there is no consensus that being listed on a stock exchange automatically denotes notability. nearlyevil 665 06:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil 665 06:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. nearlyevil 665 06:52, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as per nom. GermanKity (talk) 06:56, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete No reliable sources available in a Google search. Doesn't meet WP:ORG. --Gpkp [u • t • c] 07:49, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Agree doesn't meet WP:ORG. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 08:24, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Being listed is not a qualifier for notability. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 09:12, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete A constituent of BSE SENSEX and NIFTY 50 would be notable, but I couldn't verify it, or find a listing on either of the exchanges. Peter James (talk) 18:44, 16 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.