Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Environics Analytics

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Environics. Consensus to merge. The article has been tagged, and is awaiting an eager editor. Joyous! | Talk 01:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Environics Analytics[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Part of a group of promotional articles all centering on a non-notable marketing firm. Basil Monster 17:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:26, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Environics is notable as a Canadian pollster, as seen here. I think the two subsidiary articles can be selectively merged to parent article. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:28, 29 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Environics. While the company does have a valid notability claim and reliable source coverage, I have to agree with Shawn in that we do not need three separate articles about Environics, Environics Communications and Environics Analytics as three separate standalone topics — at this level of substance, we only need one article about the whole company, with subsections for its communications and analytics divisions. Bearcat (talk) 19:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.