Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Enventure Engineering

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. JGHowes ^talk 15:54, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Enventure Engineering[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable company with zero significant coverage in secondary sources. Does not pass NCORP or GNG. M4DU7 (talk) 23:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 23:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 23:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. M4DU7 (talk) 23:25, 11 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it fails the notability criteria as mentioned earlier and contribution is nearly entirely by one single purpose account and this looks very much like prominence increasing public relations effort. Graywalls (talk) 01:19, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Fails WP:CORP. Promotional article with PR sourcing. sixtynine ^{• whaddya want? •} 17:58, 17 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Article is purely WP:PROMO. Even one of the references are from "Online PR News". HiwilmsTalk 07:41, 18 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I am unable to locate any significant coverage with in-depth information on the company and containing independent content, references to date fail the criteria for establishing notability, topic therefore fails GNG/WP:NCORP. HighKing⁺⁺ 13:08, 19 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.